Like most things on the internet this week this blog post is inspired by the riots in the UK. Pundits, politicians and various plonkers have been throwing around explanations for 'why' this series of explosive riots and social disturbances happened. Some people blame the heat, others the effects of austerity policies on the social cohesion of poorer inner city areas. Some point to demography, others to unemployment, and even multiculturalism as key factor in setting the scene for an uprising. David Cameron's speech today pointed the finger clearly at the decay of modern society as he saw it.

Irresponsibility. Selfishness. Behaving as if your choices have no consequences.

Children without fathers. Schools without discipline. Reward without effort.

Crime without punishment. Rights without responsibilities. Communities without control.

The breakdown of the family and of established social structures looms large behind the Prime Minister's speech, and behind that, an older narrative about welfare-scrounging single mothers. But let that pass, it's a red herring in my opinion.

Mr Cameron pledges changes to the implementation of policy around 'the family'--whatever that is--and a range of measures designed to foster ownership of schools, communities, and the nation itself. It is all very worthy, and to a certain extent I'd applaud some of the sentiments, but as there are no concrete measureable policies, let alone evaluations, at hand, then we can do little but applaud fine words as just that. Words.

But I'm not sure the Prime Minister has the causality right. Causality is a funny thing in nonlinear systems. You can say X causes Y with some confidence in linear (or quasi linear) systems. But causal factors get difficult to discern when systems are complex, and complicated.

Like the real world.

It's very hard, even knowing the dynamics of any system, to assign causal status to one variable on another. But we don't know the dynamics of the real world, UK city-level system. I don't think we can know those dynamics in fact. Here are hundreds of potential causes. So rather than point out single mothers (or fathers) stuffing chips into unwanted children's' mouths and saying, without evidence, that they represent family breakdown coupled with poor feedback effects from society and particularly from the correctional and coercive parts of society, and that they are what's causing the moral breakdown, I'll just say I don't know what caused the riots.

In fact I'll never know. And neither will anyone else.

But in the rush to do something, to place blame somewhere and institute a commission or a national whateverthefuck or take people's social welfare benefits away (it's normally the poorer elements that get a kicking, isn't it? No mention of rioting middle class kids having their college entitlements removed or their taxes increased, or whatever), are they just blindly assigning causality in this situation and moving on?

What if those assigning that causality like Mr Cameron are wrong?

They will do more damage than they know, and they won't even know how bad they've made things. That's the nature of a complex system. It unfolds in an unpredictable way.

In 1945, the mathematician and all around genius Norbert Weiner wrote a beautiful paper, sadly pay gated, on the role of models in science. Weiner and his co-author Rosenblueth had the essential idea that our model of the world (X causes Y; Family breakdowns lead to violence on the streets) is built to simplify. Herbert Simon wrote in the 1950s on the problems of 'identifying' a model as being useful or not. The legendary theorist of causality, Judea Pearl, has a lot to say about causality.

They all say, essentially, it is very hard to assign causality, you should be really careful when trying to do so. Essentially you're trying to do science when you do that carefully enough.

But this is not science, this strange thing that is happening across the water from us. This is something else. Science tells us we need evidence to assign causality. And we don't have evidence, for all the harrowing stories of uprooted homes and businesses and endless hours of cctv footage. This isn't science or even a pretense of science. This is some weird PR generated witch hunt dressed up as social engineering within a large system.


1 2 3 142
March 24th, 2018

Capital inflows, crisis and recovery in small open economies

Our latest paper, and my first with my Melbourne School of Government affiliation (plus my UL one, of course) is […]

March 7th, 2018

Southern Charm

What's it like working at Australia's number one university, ranked 23rd in the world for social sciences? It's pretty cool, […]

February 7th, 2018

Freedom interview

I did an interview for an app I love using called Freedom. Basically I pay them to block off the […]

December 10th, 2017

Marian Finucane Interview

I did a fairly long interview about the experience of moving to Australia with my family. You can listen here.

November 17th, 2017

Increasing wages for macroeconomic stability

My first piece for the conversation is here. I'm arguing the economy would benefit from wage increases, paid for from […]

November 14th, 2017

Health Workforce Planning Models, Tools and Processes: An Evidence Review

Below is my recorded talk, here are my slides, and the handout for the 4th Global Forum on Human Resources for […]

October 5th, 2017

Aalborg Keynote

My talk from the fourth Nordic Post Keynesian conference is up. The full list of keynotes is here.

October 1st, 2017

AIST Debt and Demography talk

(Apparently Limerick is in the UK now!)

September 7th, 2017

My AIST Keynote: Europe Exposed

In which a camera man faints halfway through--he's OK though, I checked afterwards!

July 22nd, 2017

MacGill Summer School Speech

My speech at the MacGill Summer School is here. Thanks to Joe Muholland for inviting me to speak.

May 25th, 2017

Business Post Articles

All my Sunday Business Post articles (back to 2014/5, when I joined the paper) are available here, behind a paywall, and […]

January 15th, 2017

A month with the MacBook Pro

This is a quick update to the the previous post about getting a new MacBook Pro. So far three things […]

December 23rd, 2016

Some Thoughts on the New MacBook Pro

I’ve been working on Mac laptops since the early 2000s. I typically get a new one every 2-3 years. My […]

December 13th, 2016

Strange days indeed

We’re living through very strange times. Times when it’s a good thing that only 46 per cent of the Austrian […]

November 22nd, 2016

Will robots eat your job? @ryanavent's snapshot of a global economy in flux

Review of 'The Wealth of Humans', By Ryan Avent, Penguin, €19 Will robots eat your job? Will your kids have […]