Posts Tagged: Twitter


13
Nov 09

UL Students: Awesome.

This is why I love teaching at UL. Occasionally, you get emails like this one. A student in Economics for Business wrote me the following email after a rant in class asking why shouldn’t we double the ‘dole’ to increase consumption. Here’s her email to me, and my reply is below the fold.

Everytime we talk about the economic situation in Ireland we always focus on consumer spending.

On today’s lecture u asked what ‘What will be if the government double the dole?’. In my opinion, by doubleing the dole,at the beginning the consumer spending will increase but not for a long while. Employed people would prefer to give up their jobs and go on  social welfare benefits as they would benefit from it more. As a result, costs of production and all the other costs will increase which will lead the consumer spending to decrease. People would not operate with the same amount of money in their hands and accordingly decrease their spending and the final result will be the same as at the beginning = Recession.

In my opinion, the first thing we should concentrate on is the effect of the tax on consumer spending. Firstly, employer has to pay at the moment very high tax on his employees, eg even if employee doesnt earn that much the employer still have to pay the tax. As a matter of fact, the employers would not be able to hire that many people and the unemployment will increase. If the government decrease the taxes, employers would be able to offer more work positions and the unemployment would decrease.
Secondly, decrease in the taxes would lead to the increase in investments…Foreign countries would invest more in Ireland and open their businesses here . We have to remember that soon every country would finally beat the recession and Ireland has to be prepared for the potencial investors giving them the best conditions for the opening up their businesses such as decrease in the tax.

↓Tax => ↑Investment => ↑Work positions => ↓Unemployment => ↓Costs => ↑SPENDING

Thirdly, decrease in taxes is followed by the decrease in costs like ESB, GAS, rent,etc. So people will have more money and start saving more in case of another recession. There will be more savinig accounts opened so that their interest rates would increase the amount of money lodged and the banks would have more money to operate with so the overall bank investments in the country would increase and makes the economy moving up.
After all the unsuccessful bank operations people will lost the trust to the banks so the banks would have to increase the interest rate to attract the clients.

I know that in the case of decreasing the tax government would have to borrow the money however the same thing would happen if the government double the dole. However, decreasing the tax would make the recovery process of the economy a lot quicker.Finally  it would bring the profit to the economy and we would be able to start paying the debts. It is a big risk but we can always tryes different ways of solving the problems.

Click below for my reply, and feel free to use the comments to give your opinions on the subject.

Continue reading →


13
Jun 09

Social Media in Teaching & Research

Here’s a talk I gave on Tuesday to a symposium on Social Media with Prof. Gerry McKiernan, revolving around using social media tools like this blog, the text messaging software, and The Twitter, etc, to communicate and interact with my students. I also spoke about these papers, here,  here and here.  Slides are below.


7
Sep 08

Note to Self: Seth Godin’s The Dip

It’s a wet day before term starts, so I’m reading little bits and piece to keep me sane (also: ranting about dead socialists). I’ve just finished Seth Godin‘s The Dip, an 80 page little rant about quitting, and when it is smart to do so. Godin’s idea can be summarised in one phrase:

quit the wrong stuff, stick with the right stuff, and have the guts to do one or the other.

The idea is that we are all stuck doing things we’re not really ever going to be the best at. And that is a waste of our time. By saying yes to too many things, we create excessive commitments on our time and energy, which are scarce resources, and ensure we won’t do well at any of these things.

Being the best at something implies scarcity and therefore value, by dint of a simple ranking: there is only one Michael Phelps, and he only got that good by being really selective about what he did with his time. In his own words, “Eat, sleep, swim”.

The obvious questions are ‘which things should I quit?’, and, ‘what do I do if I can’t quit something?’

To answer the first question, Godin calls up the image of The Dip. The dip is defined as the slog between learning and mastery of a skill. So the first week of college is brilliant fun, but after four years, it really is a slog. But, on the other side of a degree, most people can see that they are changed for the better.

The slope of the Dip also matters. Microsoft, for example, created such a huge dip in the word processor market that no one can ride it through for long enough to challenge them. Competitors have to seek other paths to world domination.

There are other curves with respect to projects Godin identifies: the cul de sac, which is obvious, and the cliff. The cliff is a situation where you don’t have any incentive to quit until you fall off it, for example, smoking.

In a world where the dip dominates, diversification is a lie. Quit lots, until you find a dip you can beat for the right reasons, argues Godin. The practice this translates to is to envision what circumstances you’ll quit under, before you get into those circumstances.

Several things Godin doesn’t talk about is minor things you’d love to quit, but which have dependencies on other things you love doing. I love my job as a lecturer, but I hate marking exams. I can’t quit marking them though, because marking exams is a necessary and sufficient condition of existence as a lecturer in the KBS.

Another thing Godin glosses over is the usefulness of being well rounded. Take education, for example. Godin writes that the chap who comes out of their Leaving Certificate with an A, two B’s and three C’s is wasting his time, because he hasn’t specialised, and so is in danger of becoming mediocre. He should have concentrated on that A subject. Perhaps he will later on, say in college, but I rather like the idea of a well rounded individual who can talk to me about books, the arts, and current affairs, rather than simply asking me ‘what’s that got to do with swimming?’

So there are trade offs to Godin’s point of view. In certain areas (like my job, where I am hopelessly over committed to things right now) it makes sense to think about the dip before jumping into another new project.